Georgia Pollster Says 2020 Election Questions Were Never Fully Debunked

February 18, 2026
By External Outlet

By Matt Towery | Commentary, James Magazine Online

Since the 2020 presidential election I’ve consistently stated that, while the election may have experienced fraud, it would never be quantified. I still don’t believe it will. But if I am wrong, I will debunk my own statement.

One reason I could have to correct myself is if the U.S. Department of Justice can get its hands on the state’s complete voters list that existed during the 2020 election, and can use its vast resources to see how many improper voters were on that list who voted. That would be telling. I know that issue has allegedly been debunked but data experts I consider the best in Georgia tell me the list was full of voters who should not have been voting! 

I asked someone I consider the absolute best how many votes? The answer: 80,000. Wow! Did not expect that answer. 

But verifying that is a long shot. And no need to debunk it because it is just a theory. November 2020 was a tsunami of onetime crazy things which showered the state with ballots coming from every direction— along with ballot harvesting whose legality at that time was less clear. 

As someone who has publicly polled Georgia more than any other pollster (my good friends at Landmark and Rosetta Stone are close, but I’m just too damn old for them to equal my years) I have some standing on this issue. As a member of the State Bar of Georgia who tried a few bigtime cases years ago, I have a decent understanding of the legal matters. And as a guy who grew up in Georgia politics, held office, ran campaigns, participated in recounts and fought it out in the trenches for decades, I think I’ve earned the right to write this. 

READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT JAMES MAGAZINE ONLINE

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.